Category Archive: KTGR BLOGS

  1. Rob Fulford: “I would compare Cullen Van Leer to Ben Hansbrough”

    Comments Off on Rob Fulford: “I would compare Cullen Van Leer to Ben Hansbrough”

    How has your role as an assistant coach evolved?

    “Coach (Anderson) and I talked about that. He was open at the end of the season that he expects more from all of us this year, but me in particular. Coming in last year as an assistant coach – it was really the first time I’ve been an assistant, obviously at this level. It was a new experience for me. You feel like you want to fit in and not step on any toes. So I didn’t know what was too much, what was too little… I think it was a learning experience for everyone. (Coach Anderson) and I have agreed that I will talk until he says to shut up. I bring a lot to the table. For me, it’s just being more vocal with ideas.”

    The team looks like it’s a little smaller than you may like, but does that open things up with the offense?

    “The two things that we have this year that we didn’t have last year is we have playmakers and shooters… And when we were recruiting, that’s what we went out to get. We probably are a little undersized, but if you think about our conference – outside of Kentucky – nobody really has centers. Most of the centers in the league are 6-foot-8-inches. There’s not really any true back-to-the-basket guys anymore.  So, you don’t get hurt as much as you might think you would by being undersized. We wanted guys that could penetrate – we got guys that can penetrate. We wanted guys that could shoot – we got guys that can shoot. Now we have to create spacing for those guys to get in the lane and create shooting opportunities for others. With Terrence Phillips, Wes Clark, Tramaine Isabell and Martavian Payne – those guys can all get two feet in the paint. (Kevin) Puryear is a pick and pop guy that can really shoot. Cullen (Van Leer) doesn’t miss. I just think we have a lot of guys – with KJ (Walton) that can shoot, Namon (Wright) that can shoot. We’re a totally different team than we were last year. Last year, we had a couple guys that the ball stuck with. This year, it won’t do that. These guys are making the extra pass. And now, for us, we have to create the system – we don’t have to create it, it’s created. We just have to put it in.”

    What kind of offense will you be running this year?

    “Mike D’Antoni and I are from the same small town in Mullens, West Virginia. I have his playbook sitting up in my office. And a lot of people run it. At Iowa State, that’s what (Fred) Hoiberg ran. A lot of people run it, a lot of people use it because it creates mismatches. It lets guys play. But it’s all about reading what the defense gives you out of it. It’s extremely hard to guard because you have space. For us, it makes sense to do that. And it wouldn’t have last year.”

    Will the offense look different to fans than it did last year? 

    “I would think it’s going to be a lot more up-tempo, a lot quicker. We don’t have a true 5, a true 4. (Ryan) Rosburg is probably a ‘true’ 5, and then Russell Woods is probably more of a 4 that will be playing a 5. And then Jakeenan (Gant) is probably a ‘true’ 4, but an athletic 4. Other than Ryan (Rosburg), those guys are face-up guys. When you put 4 and 5’s on the other team in pick-and-roll situations at the same time, it creates driving lanes, it creates bigs that can pull guys away. Jakeenan (Gant) is working on his face-up and rip-throughs. We’re going to run some of the same things that we did last year, but from an overall offensive standpoint, it’s going to be a little bit faster.”

    Looking at the recruiting class, everyone seems to have a defined role. Is that what you were going for?

    “We needed to get guys that could fill voids that we had last year. As you sit back and you look at the season we had last year – we just didn’t have enough playmakers. When we got open shots, we just didn’t make enough shots. Now, we have a competitive environment… Bob Knight used to call it ‘butt to brain.’ When things aren’t going well, at some point, your butt’s going to tell your brain to get off the bench. We have competition. We just didn’t have a lot of that last year. This year, we’re a lot deeper. And the makeup of the team is a lot different. I mean, we had to scheme last year just to stay in some games. And I think this year, it’s going to be a little more open.”

    On paper, there seems to be 12 guys that are competing for playing time. Can that make things difficult when it comes to building a rotation?

    “It’s competition. Guys will hold each other accountable. We’ll hold them accountable. But that’s what you have to create. You have to create an identity for the team. Coach wants to hold these guys accountable for their actions. And it’s not just off the court, but on the court. These guys have been great so far. And I think having too many players is a good problem to have. When I was in prep school, there were years when I had 8, 9, 10 division-1 players on my team. You can’t play that many guys. I had a kid going to Baylor that averaged 5 minutes per game. He averaged 5 minutes per game because he didn’t choose to work as hard as the guy that was playing 25 minutes.”

    How has Tramaine Isabell evolved as a player and a person?

    “He was suspended some games – I think it was good for him, because he matured. Some people will look at it and think, ‘he got suspended for x amount of games’, but when he came back, he’s been a totally different kid. It helped him understand that it’s more about the team than it is him. And he’s really matured. And, from that, he’s been a much better leader. It’s just the little things that we do as coaches. Like, ‘hey, make sure all the guys are at such and such at this time.’ I’ve let Tramaine take a role. Like, ‘hey, this is your week.’ or, we have to do this tonight. Make sure you text everybody.’ Just putting little leadership roles on him that last year, he wouldn’t have done. I probably had to text him to get him there, not have him get everyone else there. Just from a maturity standpoint, he’s been great so far.”

    There were a lot of fans questioning the Cullen Van Leer signing. What should fans know about Cullen?

    “He was a local kid that the national media had never heard of. They had never seen him play. I watched him play about seven games last spring. And we basically told coach, ‘hey, that’s exactly what we have to have.’ It’s a situation were – some guys get over-hyped in high school.  We know that. And Cullen’s one of those guys that – night in and night out, opposing coaches are going to scout for him. Because, you can’t leave him open. Are we going to have to do some things defensively? Probably early on. But, he’s athletic. He can defend. But, it gets into a case where, even the local people look at it and they’re like, ‘he’s a three-star… He’s not a top 150 guy.’ But, I’ve said this before, you give me a three-star guy that wants to be a five-star guy instead of the five-star guy that works like a three-star any day of the week. And I think, for him, he buys into that. And you look at all of our freshmen – Terrence (Phillips), he wasn’t highly recruited. But he wants to prove that he belongs. KJ (Walton) is a four-star kid, but schools dropped off on him because his academics didn’t look like they were going to get in line. So, those guys have things to prove. With Cullen (Van Leer), he has things to prove within the state of Missouri. There are a lot of people within the state of Missouri that didn’t think he was good enough to be here. And that couldn’t be further from the truth. He’s a really good player. He’s going to have a great career at Missouri. I told coach – coach was like, ‘well, I don’t know… He reminds me – and I hope he has the type of career that this kid has – the comparison I would probably put on him that people may relate to a little bit, is Ben Hansbrough. I think that’s what he will be by the end of his career.”

  2. Tramaine Isabell: “Coach Anderson has taken me under his wing”

    Comments Off on Tramaine Isabell: “Coach Anderson has taken me under his wing”

    Have you noticed a difference what you are working on right now compared to what you were working on at this point last summer?

    “Last year we worked a lot on defense. This year we’re working on getting our stamina up so we can run and play fast.”

    What have you seen from the freshman class?

    “They work hard. They’re a very competitive group. All of them bring something the team can use.”

    What do you think was the team’s lowest point last year?

    “The game at Kentucky was the lowest (point). It wasn’t that they were 49 points better than us, it was that we weren’t playing together… We weren’t ‘in it.’ And that became 16 games. I think the 16-game losing streak was my lowest point.”

    For you, personally, was there a moment or a game that hurt the most? 

    “One of my lowest points was after the Kentucky game. I had never been in something like that before. I feel like, as a group, that sucked for all of us. And I think that’s why my class wanted to stick together, so we could figure it out.”

    How would you describe your relationship with Coach Anderson?

    “He’s taken me under his wing. I talk to him all the time. He’s helped me in a lot of ways. He’s pushing me to be the best I can be.”

    Coach Anderson was recently quoted as saying, ‘Tramaine Isabell is the reason you coach.’ What does that mean to you?

    “That means a lot. Last year, I didn’t get to showcase how good I can be. Not because of my talent, but because of certain things that he expects from his point guard. I’ve been doing those things, and I’ve been getting better at those things. Hopefully that can help us succeed.”

    Your high school career was well documented in Washington, and if I recall, you had some struggles over the first couple years. Were you able to draw anything from that as you were going through the struggles of last season?

    “I went to a very small private high school that’s very focused on education. We weren’t very good at all my first two years there. My first year, we were sub-.500. My sophomore year we were sub-.500. Everyone thought I would leave and go to one of the public schools. But my junior year – we stuck it out – and after the core had been together for so long, we got really good because of team chemistry. Not because we were better than everybody. And we ended up making it to the state championship. I know a program doesn’t happen like that (snaps). And I know one bad year can’t define a program. So I’m excited to see where we go from here.”

    You look bigger and stronger… Is that something you put an emphasis on throughout the spring and into the summer? 

    “I have been in the weight room for the weight room. I worked a lot back home with my trainers. I’ve been working with Coach (Matt) Herring in the weight room. I feel like I’ve gotten quicker and I’ve gotten stronger… I feel like last year I was trying to keep up with others. I want it to be the exact opposite.”

  3. A Sign of Improvement from Maty Mauk?

    Comments Off on A Sign of Improvement from Maty Mauk?

    Daniel Jeremiah’s Move the Sticks podcast on the NFL’s “All 3rd Down Team” got me to thinking – how did Mizzou perform on third down last year? Specifically, how did Maty Mauk perform?

    Missouri is one of just five SEC teams that has the same starting quarterback entering the 2015 season as it did entering the 2014 season. That’s pretty startling, considering Missouri and Mississippi State are the only two of those five teams that finished the 2014 season with a winning conference record.

    The first thought that came to mind as I prepared to dig into the research was that Missouri struggled mightily on third down at the start of SEC play. How much of that was on Mauk, though? I wasn’t sure. I’m still not sure, honestly. But I know the numbers now… And, WOOF. Those first four games were U-G-L-Y.

    As for how I came up with these numbers – I did it the old fashioned way. I went through the play-by-play of every game, charted every third down play, and came up with some interesting results.

     

    Maty Mauk on third down in non-conference play:

    1) South Dakota State – 2/6 for 1 first down, 0 first down runs (0 rush attempts), 0 sacks, 1 TD, 0 INT

    2) Toledo – 6/9 for 4 first downs, 0 first down runs (0 rush attempts), 0 sacks, 2 TD, 1 INT

    3) Central Florida – 4/6 for 2 first downs, 2 first down runs (2 rush attempts), 0 sacks, 2 TD, 0 INT

    4) Indiana – 1/10 for 1 first down, 1 first down run (2 rush attempts), 1 sack, 0 TD, 0 INT

    Non-Conference Totals: 13/31 for 8 first downs, 5 TDs, 1 INT, 2 sacks, 3 rushing 1st downs (4 rush attempts)

     

    Maty Mauk on third down in SEC play:

    1) South Carolina – 2/10 for 0 first downs, 1 first down run (1 rush attempt), 1 sack, 0 TD, 0 INT

    2) Georgia – 0/4 for 0 first downs, 0 first down runs (1 rush attempt), 0 sacks, 0 TD, 1 INT

    3) Florida – 2/6 for 1 first down, 2 first down runs (4 rush attempts), 0 sacks, 0 TD, 1 INT

    4) Vanderbilt – 2/7 for 2 first downs, 2 first down runs (2 rush attempts), 1 sack, 0 TD, 0 INT

    5) Kentucky – 7/9 for 5 first downs, 2 first down runs (4 rush attempts), 1 sack, 0 TD, 0 INT

    6) Texas A&M – 5/7 for 4 first downs, 0 first down runs (1 rush attempt), 0 sacks, 0 TD, 0 INT

    7) Tennessee – 5/9 for 2 first downs, 1 first down run (1 rush attempt), 0 sacks, 2 TD, 0 INT

    8) Arkansas – 5/8 for 5 first downs, 2 first down runs (3 rush attempts), 1 sack, 0 TD, 0 INT

    SEC Totals: 28/60 for 19 first downs, 2 TD’s, 2 INT’s, 4 sacks, 10 rushing 1st downs (17 rush attempts)

     

    SEC Splits:

    First Four Games: 6/27 for 5 first downs, 0 TD’s, 2 INT’s, 2 sacks, 5 rushing 1st downs (8 rush attempts)

    Final Four Games: 22/33 for 14 first downs, 2 TD’s, 0 INT’s, 2 sacks, 5 rushing 1st downs (9 rush attempts)

     

    There you have it. Maty Mauk’s third down results in the 2014 season. Some of my top takeaways:

    1. Many Missouri fans the loss against Indiana on Markus Golden’s injury – and I do believe Missouri wins that game if Markus Golden plays. However, Mauk going 1/10 on third down certainly didn’t help.
    2. Mauk was hugely inconsistent on third down in non-conference slate. He was 3/16 with three total first downs against South Dakota State and Indiana, but he was 10/15 for 8 total first downs against Toledo and UCF.
    3. Mauk was less inconsistent in SEC play. His play on third down can pretty much be divided into the first half of SEC play and the second half of SEC play. In the first half he was bad. In the second half he was actually pretty damn impressive.
    4. One thing I noticed as I was going through the game logs – and I would have to research further to prove this true or untrue – is that Mauk seemed most comfortable (and successful) throwing to three players: Bud Sasser, Jimmie Hunt and Marcus Murphy. I would estimate that more than 70 percent of his first downs in the 2nd half of SEC were completed to one of those three players.
    5. The second half of the season has to be an encouraging sign to Mizzou fans. Mauk had his struggles in 2014, and those struggles are well documented. But he was solid in the second half of the season. If he can build upon that and keep up that level of play for all of 2015 – even despite his losses at wide receiver – the Tigers will be in position to win double-digit games once again.
  4. Justin Houston makes NFL Network’s “All 3rd Down Team”

    Comments Off on Justin Houston makes NFL Network’s “All 3rd Down Team”

    Daniel Jeremiah of NFL.com posted a great podcast on the “All NFL 3rd Down Team” on Monday. The premise of the podcast was to find the players that performed at the highest level on 3rd down throughout the 2014 football season. Jeremiah was joined by NFL Network researcher Bill Smith, who provided all of the numbers and statistics throughout the podcast. Below are some of the best nuggets from the podcast.

    Quarterbacks:

    Top 5 Quarterbacks in QB Rating on 3rd Down in 2014:

    1) Aaron Rodgers – 15 TD, 2 INT; Best passer rating on 3rd down (121.7)

    2) Carson Palmer – 10 TD, 2 INT; 2nd best passer rating on 3rd down (119.4)

    3) Tony Romo

    4) Andrew Luck

    5) Peyton Manning

    Other Notable QBs on 3rd Down in ’14:

    10) Tom Brady – 10 TD, 3 INT; 10th in passer rating on 3rd down

    27) Russell Wilson – 2 TD, 4 INT; 27th in passer rating on 3rd down

    Cam Newton – 24 RUSHING 1st downs on 3rd down (most in the NFL. Lynch 2nd w/ 19)

    Running Backs:

    Notable RBs on 3rd Down in ’14:

    Le’Veon Bell – 20 receptions (15/20 went for 1st downs)… Top 5 in rushes converted for 1st down

    Matt Forte – 21 receptions (6/21 went for 1st downs)… Top 5 in rushes converted for 1st down

    Wide Receivers:

    WR’s w/ the highest percentage of 3rd Down Receptions Converted for 1st Downs in ’14:

    T1) Marques Colston – 11 receptions (11/11 converted for first down)

    T1) Brandon Marshall – 14 receptions (11/11 converted for 1st down)

    3) Mike Evans – 21 receptions (20/21 converted for 1st down)

    4) Randall Cobb – 26 receptions (24/26 converted for 1st down; 6 TDs)

    5) Antonio Brown – 36 receptions (28/36 converted for 1st down)

    WRs w/ the Most 3rd Down Receptions in ’14:

    1) Antonio Brown – 36 receptions

    2) Golden Tate – 34 receptions

    T3) Demaryius Thomas & James Jones – 31 receptions

    T5) Anquan Boldin & Odell Beckham Jr. – 30 receptions

    Tight Ends:

    Notable TEs on 3rd Down in ’14:

    Rob Gronkowski – 22 receptions (21/22 1st downs 16 yards per reception; 3 TDs)

    Antonio Gates – 20 receptions (20/21 1st downs; 6 TDs)

    Pass Rushers:

    Notable Pass Rushers on 3rd Down in ’14:

    T1) Connor Barwin – 9 sacks

    T1) Justin Houston – 9 sacks

    T4) JJ Watt – 7 sacks

    T4) Paul Kruger – 7 sacks

    T9) Von Miller- 5.5 sacks

    T9) Olivier Vernon- 5.5 sacks

    T9) Robert Quinn – 5.5 sacks

    Everson Griffin – 5 sacks

    DeMarcus Ware – 2.5 sacks

    Aaron Donald – 2 sacks

    Inside Linebackers:

    Notable ILB’s on 3rd Down in ’14:

    CJ Mosley – 31 tackles on 3rd down

    DeAndre Levy – 4 PBU on 3rd down

  5. The Sports Wire: Craig Edwards

    Comments Off on The Sports Wire: Craig Edwards

    BK penned an article suggesting Jason Heyward could command up to $200 million on the open market after the season. Craig Edwards of Viva El Birdos and Fangraphs seems to agree, and he wouldn’t be disappointed if the Cardinals were the team that gave Heyward the money. That, plus what Jaime Garcia has to do the remainder of this season for the Red Birds to pick up his option, and will the Cardinals win over or under 100 games?

    All of that and more in our conversation with Craig Edwards from Saturday on The Sports Wire.

    PODCAST: 

  6. The Sports Wire: John Harris

    Comments Off on The Sports Wire: John Harris

    John Harris is an excellent analyst for HoustonTexans.com, but he’s also a former high school football coach, and the love for the game carries over to the college football level. So much so that John has a new SEC Football Preview Magazine available online! He joined BK on The Sports Wire to take a way-too-early look at the Missouri Tigers, including why he believes Evan Boehm is the best center in the country, how Kenya Dennis compares to Chiefs first round pick Marcus Peters, and why John loves watching Sean Culkin.

    All of that and more in Saturday’s conversation with John Harris on The Sports Wire.

    PODCAST: 

  7. Is Jason Heyward a $200 million player?

    Comments Off on Is Jason Heyward a $200 million player?

    Jason Heyward’s career batting average is below .270. He’s never hit more than 27 home runs or stolen more than 21 bases in a season.

    Despite some of Heyward’s less-than-stellar traditional metrics, the St. Louis Cardinals were willing to part with four years of club control over starting pitcher Shelby Miller in order to acquire Heyward’s plus-defense, solid base running and, at times, impressive power hitting. Why would the Cardinals do that if they didn’t believe they could re-sign the 25-year-old corner outfielder? The short answer is that they probably wouldn’t.

    The long answer is why I’m writing this article.

    Heyward is a fascinating case-study. He’s a free agent after the 2015 season, and he will enter the market at the young age of 25. Heyward is a sabermetric wizard. His advanced metrics are among the best in baseball. He’s the MLB leader in defensive runs saved since 2010. The only outfielders with a higher WAR than Heyward since 2010 are Andrew McCutchen, Mike Trout, Jose Bautista, Ben Zobrist (what?) and Matt Holliday. The talent is there, and the production – however unconventional – has been omnipresent since he first hit the big leagues in 2010.

    And this brings us to Heyward’s open-market value. I’ll start by stating the obvious: it’s incredibly difficult to project how Heyward will finish this season, and it’s even more difficult to project exactly how much someone would be willing to spend on a 25-year-old corner outfielder. One reason it’s so difficult to project is because this simply doesn’t happen in the MLB.

    In talking with someone who has knowledge of these sort of contract negotiations, three names came up as recent examples of players that hit free agency at such a young age: Prince Fielder in 2012, Adrian Beltre in 2005 and Alex Rodriguez in 2000. Fielder was 28 years old when he signed a nine-year, $214 million contract, Beltre was 26 at the time of his five-year, $64 million deal and Rodriguez signed a 10-year, $252 million deal when he was 25.

    In short, it’s been 15+ years since we’ve seen a position player in the same stratosphere as Heyward reach the open market before his 27th birthday. Why does this matter, exactly? Well, a team could conceivably sign Heyward to a 10-year deal, and get his prime for roughly 70 percent of the contract. If a team gives a 10-year deal to a 30-year-old player, he’s going to be in his prime for less than half of the deal. That makes a huge difference in the expected return on investment.

    So, what are the numbers going to look like? Dave Cameron of Fangraphs has a great write-up on exactly what we could expect. Cameron uses Carl Crawford, Carlos Beltran, Ichiro Suzuki and Jacoby Ellsbury as his comparisons for Heyward. None of the four contracts are a perfect comparison, but using all four as a guide can be of some assistance.

    Lets start with Carl Crawford, who signed a seven-year, $142 million deal in 2010 when he was 28 years old. Keep in mind, comparing contracts from 2010 to those signed in 2015 can be difficult. In order to compare the contracts fairly, we must take inflation into account. Based on Cameron’s conversions, Crawford’s seven-year, $142 million contract in 2010 would be a seven-year, $175 million deal in 2015. That’s a lot of money. But, it’s only one contract. How does Crawford’s contract compare with his peers? Lets take a look.

    Year & Age when Signed: Contract at time of signing: Contract adjusted for inflation (per Fangraphs):
    Carl Crawford 2010, 29 7 yr, $142M 7 yr, $175M
    Carlos Beltran 2005, 28 7 yr, $119M 7 yr, $201M
    Ichiro Suzuki 2007, 34 5 yr, $90M 5 yr, $124M
    Jacoby Ellsbury 2013, 30 7 yr, $153M 7 yr, $161M

    There you have it. The closest comparisons, based on the advanced metrics, for Jason Heyward’s upcoming contract. If you look at the contracts as average dollars per year, here’s how they break down: Crawford $25 million/year, Beltran $29 million/year, Suzuki $25 million/year, Ellsbury $23 million/year.

    Lets say Heyward were to sign a seven-year contract. If you take the averages of the four contracts listed above, you could expect something along the lines of a seven-year, $175 million contract. That would tie Giancarlo Stanton as the highest average salary ($25 million) among right fielders. The only position players in all of baseball with a higher average salary would be Miguel Cabrera and Alex Rodriguez.

    Will Heyward end up getting $25 million per year? It’s hard to say. It certainly seems possible. Will the Cardinals be the team that gives him that money? I have my doubts on that. This is the purple elephant in the room any time we in the media discuss Jason Heyward this season. We have no idea what will ultimately take place, but what we do know is that a free agent deal will be struck with Jason Heyward at some point between now and next season.

    The Cardinals, and their fans, seem to believe that contract will be with St. Louis. But at what cost? That remains to be seen.

  8. BK’s Daily Grind: Jaime Garcia dominates, Justin Houston underrated & woman loses eyesight after participating in mud run

    Comments Off on BK’s Daily Grind: Jaime Garcia dominates, Justin Houston underrated & woman loses eyesight after participating in mud run

    KANSAS CITY ROYALS:

    The purple elephant in the room for the Kansas City Royals is the fact that 90 percent of the current roster will become a free agent by 2018. In some respects, that’s good business by Kansas City – they’re not bogged down by old, expensive players. In other respects, it’s the cold, hard reality that this wave of talent could come and go within the next two and a half years. Royals Review has a great breakdown of the Royals’ contract situations, and this is the reason that I’ve pounded the table for the Royals to trade for a starting pitcher. Kansas City’s window is now. The Royals might be the best team in a mediocre American League. If you believe that to be true, then you believe that they can make a return trip to the World Series. Make it happen, Dayton.

    Do the Royals really need to trade for a starting pitcher? Friend of the show Jeff Sullivan takes a look in his latest column for Fangraphs. Great information.
    ST. LOUIS CARDINALS:

    Dave Schoenfield penned a great column on Cardinals starter Jaime Garcia. Some of my favorite nuggets: Garcia has been the most “efficient” starter in the MLB this year, averaging 13.5 pitches per inning. The other fascinating stat: Jaime Garcia’s average fastball in 2011 – before his surgeries – was 89.8 miles per hour. His average fastball velocity this year is 90.5 miles per hour. His velocity has increased after his injuries. That’s outstanding. Garcia was dominant once again last night. He gave up one run – a solo shot from Giancarlo Stanton – in 7 innings. His season ERA is down to 1.69. He’s gone at least six innings in each of his seven starts in 2015. What a comeback.

    KANSAS CITY CHIEFS & ST. LOUIS RAMS:

    The NFL Network is revealing their annual “NFL Top 100″ this summer. Yesterday they revealed that Justin Houston is the no. 27 player in the NFL. Excuse me? Number 27? For those of you that forgot, Justin Houston was dominant in 2014. He finished the year with a league-leading 22 sacks. He also had the most QB hurries in the NFL, according to Pro Football Focus. I can’t name more than five defensive players that I would rather have than Justin Houston. And yet he’s ranked as the 27th best player in the NFL? Okay. Sure.
    MIZZOU ATHLETICS:

    Missouri football fell out of ESPN’s top 25 “future power ranking” for 2015. Don’t worry about this, Mizzou fans. It’s a ranking based on recruiting rankings and overall “talent” on the roster. Coach Pinkel has shown enough at this point to know that his recruiting rankings mean very, very little. Is it nice to have four-star recruits on the roster? Of course. But Pinkel’s success at Missouri has come from scouting, selecting and developing. He and his staff do it as well as anyone in the country. Lists like this will never rank Missouri in the top 10-15. That’s fine. It’s not what Pinkel built this program on.

    Mizzou baseball has added Jerry Zulli as an assistant coach. Zulli will serve as an assistant coach and the team’s recruiting coordinator. Prior to coming to Missouri, Zulli spent 7 years at Memphis and four years at South Alabama.

    Gabe DeArmond and the guys at PowerMizzou caught up with Mizzou sophomore guard Tramaine Isabell yesterday, and I thought some of his answers showed maturity & growth as an individual, both of which seemed to be hindering him in his freshman year at Missouri.

    “PM.com: How much of your game that you think you’re capable of playing did Missouri fans actually see last year?

    TI: “Honestly, I don’t think I got to showcase what I can really do. In spurts, I got to, I had a few games where I got to play because of injuries or suspensions. Auburn, Arkansas I got to play a lot of minutes. I don’t feel like I got to show exactly what I can do, but I’m excited, I’m going to keep working hard and competing so I can get those minutes because coming in my freshman year, I probably didn’t earn the minutes I needed to. Coach Anderson was serious on earning those minutes at practice so that’s what I’m bringing this summer.”

    Also on PowerMizzou is a great article/Q&A with Mizzou baseball coach Tim Jamieson. I can’t remember Jamieson ever being as open and revealing about his team, Missouri’s place in the SEC, his job, and the MU facilities. Missouri fans won’t love verything Jamieson says, but I think you will respect the honesty.

    “Jamieson said on Wednesday that he understands that as part of that commitment, his program has to win. But even when Missouri has won, the Tigers have battled attendance issues. This year, Missouri averaged 840 fans per home game. If that number was doubled, it would still rank last in the SEC by more than 200 per game. Tennessee averaged 1,889 fans per game. That is 13th in the SEC–and 35th in the country.”

     

    Friend of the show, Sam Snelling, has a great post over at Rock M Nation on Mizzou basketball’s 2017 recruiting tactics. Here’s the short of it: Missouri has a lot of in-state talent in 2017, none more publicized than Columbia’s own Michael Porter Jr. If Coach Anderson could land any combination of Porter, East St. Louis center Jeremiah Tilmon – a 5-star in his own right – and Porter’s friend Trae Young, the Tigers will have a legitimate shot at making a tournament run in 2017. That’s the year that Missouri fans should have circled. That will be the 2015 freshman class’ senior year. The incoming freshman class will be juniors, and that freshman class could include some true top-end talent. If you’re hoping for a return trip to the Elite 8, that’s the year it could happen. But it all comes down to recruiting. And, for that, I must defer to Sam’s analysis over at Rock M Nation.

    You will enjoy this whether you’re a Mizzou fan, a college basketball fan, or a fan of good documentaries. Kareem Rush has done some really cool things of late. We actually caught up with Kareem a couple months ago on The Big Show. If you missed that conversation, the full podcast can be heard here.

    OTHER SPORTS:

    I’m not sure where this belongs, but Aaron Rodgers & Olivia Munn are reportedly on the rocks.

    This is an interesting chart comparing the top spenders vs. top winners in the NHL over the years.

    The Big 12 might be looking to expand (again). Jon Solomon lists the top candidates for the Big 12.

    NON-SPORTS:

    A condom that changes colors when it comes into contact with STI’s invented by a group of school pupils.

    A Dallas woman lost sight in her eye after participating in a mud run. The cause: flesh-eating bacteria.

    Study finds that Whole Foods has been overcharging their customers.

  9. BK’s Daily Grind: An oral history of the Royals vs. A’s, top MLB trade targets & a fish with human teeth?

    Comments Off on BK’s Daily Grind: An oral history of the Royals vs. A’s, top MLB trade targets & a fish with human teeth?

    KANSAS CITY ROYALS:

    This is a great read on how the Royals-A’s plunkfest took place back in May. It reads as a sort of oral history, and Scott Miller of Bleacher Report did a great job on the story. The Royals travel to Oakland this weekend to take on the A’s for the first time since that ugly series.

    What an up-and-down season. Royals Review breaks down which Royals bats are trending up and which bats are trending down.

    ST. LOUIS CARDINALS:

    ESPN ranked the top holes on each contender. They have the Cardinals’ biggest hole as first base, and they see Brewers’ first baseman Adam Lind as the top trade target for the Red Birds.

    MIZZOU ATHLETICS:

    The guys over at PowerMizzou ranked the top 15 offensive and defensive players in the Gary Pinkel era. They came up with a top 3 offensive players of Chase Daniels, Brad Smith and Jeremy Maclin. The top 3 defensive players were Sean Weatherspoon, Shane Ray and Sheldon Richardson.

    ESPN’s Alex Scarborough seems to believe the SEC’s reign of terror over the SEC may be coming to a close.

    OTHER SPORTS:

    ESPN has released its nominees for the ESPY’s. Of local importance: The Royals winning the AL Pennant is nominated for the “biggest sports upset”, and the Royals’ Wild Card Game is nominated for “best game”.

    Alabama fans looked for comfort after their NCAA Championship Game loss. Many of them turned to Pornhub, according to the statistics.

    This guy might be the cockiest NBA prospect of all time. I love him. Most of you will hate him.

    https://vine.co/v/e5vxFDebpip

    Baby in hand, bottle in the baby’s mouth. Foul ball coming your way. No glove. “—- it.” What a snag!

    Gio Gonzalez has a wonderful beard. Now, his beard has been sponsored. This got me to thinking… Who has the best sports beard? It has to be Brett Keisel, right?

    https://twitter.com/theScore/status/613548397870514180

    I don’t love these. I also don’t love the fact that the NBA is changing so many uniforms. I know they have to with the switch to Adidas, but they will switch again in three years when the NBA goes back to Nike.

    NON-SPORTS:

    This fish has human teeth. I repeat, this fish has HUMAN TEETH! This is not a drill.

    hoverboard is coming!

  10. MU Board of Curators to review Mizzou Softball Stadium plan

    Comments Off on MU Board of Curators to review Mizzou Softball Stadium plan

    The University of Missouri has released new renderings and details about its $16 million softball stadium project. According to details documented in the agenda for Thursday’s MU Board of Curators meeting, the softball stadium will be funded from $13.5 million in private gifts and $2.5 million in debt financing.

    The university states that the new facilities will provide fans with a “full-view” concourse and outfield plaza, a 1,600 to 1,700 seat venue and an outfield lawn area offering space for an additional 500 to 1,000 fans. The new stadium will include an elevated press box with radio and television broadcast booths, a writing press suite and a game management booth. A ticket booth will be located near the south entrance main gates (pictured below).

    MUSB

    The improvements are also expected to include heated dugouts, batting cages and bullpens for each teams. The dimensions of the field will also be slightly different. Missouri will push the fences back in accordance with upcoming NCAA regulations. The field dimensions will be 190 feet down the lines and 230 feet to center field. The home run will will be six feet in height. The field will be a natural turf outfield, dirt infield with apron inserts of synthetic turf, and a crushed brick 10 foot warning track.

    SoftballStadium

     

    The project will also include the redevelopment of the MU student and commuter parking lot. The construction of the project will displace 503 parking spaces, and a new parking lot will be constructed south of Champions Drive at the intersection with Providence Point Drive. The new lot will replace 251 parking spaces.

    MUSBParking

    The plans also include a new band practice “field” that will be constructed south of the new parking lot. A new storage building and parking area for the band’s semi-trailer will also be located next to the practice area. The total bid construction cost is $11.6 million, according to the MU Board of Curators agenda documents. The new parking lot is expected to be completed in November. The new softball stadium is expected to be complete by December, 2016.